This week we discussed the ideas of line and shape.
Line at first glance is fairly obvious. However, there are some things I hadn’t considered to be a line, at least consciously. The main part I had not considered to be a line would be the invisible line created by either the edges of several objects in a row, or the line created by an arrow or perhaps the direction a person’s eyes are looking.
I cannot immediately think of any websites I have recently been to that employ an invisible line with an arrow or eyes, but I have certainly been to many sites that create lines with the edges of many boxes. Often times this is done with the buttons that compose a navigation menu.
Moving on the topic of shapes, we defined shape as a line and the area enclosed by that line. Then if a third dimension is added to the shape, volume, or imaginary space, is created. We discussed the many different ways you can present shapes and the effect that will have on the audience.
Things like making buttons on a website all the same shape will help the viewer understand that each shape represents a button, even if these buttons have different text or graphics on them. Another element we talked about was that humans generally prefer an image with the light source coming from the upper left portion of the picture. I found this particularly interesting as I remember reading an article a year or so ago talking about website layout and where to place “action” buttons.
Both of the lighting of an image, and placement of “action” buttons seem to stem from the way we read, left to right, top to bottom. These “action” buttons I am talking about refer to buttons that the designer would like the user to click. This could mean the user is purchasing an item, filling out a form, clicking a link to another website, or other things. The article I read that you should place these items in the lower-left portion of a webpage because that is where a readers eyes will naturally end up, and also the portion of the page they are most likely to read.
I feel the use of shape on a website is a very tricky topic, as too many unnatural shapes can easily overwhelm the viewer. A good example of a website that makes appropriate use of shape in my opinion is newegg.com. They keep a pretty straight forward design, but subtly work the “egg” into many places.
I cannot immediately think of a website I have recently been to that displayed an annoying amount of shapes, mainly because I do not stay at websites like that for long. The only thing that immediately comes to mind are the websites of the early 2000s, where animated FIFs and ridiculous word-art was displayed everywhere. Websites such as those try to use a variety of shapes and colors to impress the viewer, yet all that is created is confusion, whereas websites today that are much more complex can be presented in a much more pleasing way when design elements are kept constant throughout the pages and subtle accents are used.
That’s all I have to say this week.





