This week our assignment was to pick out three magazines from a news stand or similar place that caught our eye, and then analyze them. I took a slightly different approach, I just looked at magazine subscriptions on Amazon.com and picked out the three magazines that caught my eye the most. Here they are with analysis:
The first magazine I saw that really stood out to me was Country Living:

I have absolutely no desire whatsoever to read this magazine, but the big spider on the cake really caught my eye. I think the reason it caught my eye was almost an unconscious reaction to danger. It was more like a double-take, where I needed to check and make sure the spider was not real. This is a type of advertising I had never considered before, but it worked really well on me. I may start to look for other designs that play on unconscious or natural reactions.
To analyze the rest of the cover, I think the content is appropriately spaced on the cover to give a brief idea of what is in the magazine, yet not overwhelm a buyer. The color scheme is very appropriate for the upcoming Halloween season.
I think the Halloween theme may help promote an impulse buy, however I am not any part of the cover would help this magazine sell outside of its intended demographic. The spider image certainly is eye-catching though.
My second magazine was Newsweek:

This time I was drawn to the cover text. I found it utterly confusing as to how a baby could be racist. I tend to think of babies in the sense of tabula rasa or blank slate, where they are young and innocent and have not yet been exposed to things such as racism. Then when I read the sub-text that the article is on a study of whether things like racism are genetic I was really interested. I am still not sure I would purchase this magazine at news stand price, but if it was sitting out in a waiting room I would definitely read it.
In terms of actual design, I find this cover rather boring. I do think the black background and shadows really helps play into the dark take on infantile innocence. It is also difficult to determine the expression the child is making, it is a very neutral face. A lot of space is devoted to the picture with little additional text on the page.
I can see this cover making impulse sales at the news stand because the article on racism can easily be understood by anyone, including those not usually interested in the type of current news Newsweek generally covered. Along those same lines, I think this cover would make sales outside of the intended demographic. Again for the same reason, it is a topic numerous groups would be interested in, and that everyone can relate to on some level.
My third magazine was Your Big Backyard:

My reasoning behind choosing this cover is quite simple. I love tigers. I do not know what type of magazine this is, but I am guessing it is a children’s magazine. So I would probably not buy this magazine, but I would definitely look at the pictures of tigers in it.
To examine the design elements, this is a very simple cover. Big tiger picture, check. Name of magazine, check. Two-word explanation of what is in the magazine, check. And that is all. Obviously, a lot of space is reserved for the photo, unfortunately I feel they made the tiger too big. It is often difficult to find a decent color to go across a patterning similar to the tigers, where the text must show up over both light and dark colors, they did an acceptable job by using a border on the text and choosing a fairly neutral color, but I still think it may have been better to shrink the tiger so that a more uniform background could have been used for the text.
I can certainly see this being an impulse buy for a little child, or even potentially for someone who likes tigers as much as I do. So in that sense, I can see this magazine selling outside its normal demographic of children.